I haven't really gotten into this yet. So here's one of my procrastination e-mails from a few nights ago.
Of course, I'm procrastinating again at 2:30AM. Why else would I be emailing? Even though my application package for the rapport fellowship is due in 13 hours, who needs sleep, eh?
Well, seriously, sometime my procrastination leads me to believe that I should just drop everything and go to divinity school. We're on the topic of Matthew now in the NT. You all already know now that Matthew is not my favorite gospel; but I think it's kind of exciting that we're all doing this together, because at least from my end, I find it rather interesting what you all think as we progress throgh the Gospels. Is all of this real? Is it the world's greatest modern myth? Have we, for the past 2000 years, been coaxed into an idea of Jesus Christ, for better of for world, to literally establish a new path for civilization? Moreover, based on the gospels and the NT, whether faith, fact, or fiction, in what form will the New Messiah take form? Will he or she be an academic leader? Some kid from Miami? The alleged anti-christ that is feared to have come out of the Vatican? President Bush?
I've been listening the excerpts from Bach's "Saint Matthew's Passion." The actual thing is over almost four hours long. It's an absolutely amazing event; and even more exciting when you're in the chorus singing. The version that I am listening to -- performed by the Hungarian National Symphony Orchestra at Royal Albert Concert Hall in London, England -- is by far the best rendition of it done by modern man.
I couldn't help but think, however, what Bach was up to when he wrote the whole thing. I know that historically, Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, all the great musician/composers of the time were commissioned by the Church to prepare these elaborate Orchestra pieces. The elite would attend these concerts, often held at the great Cathedrals in England, France, and Germany, to show how "Catholic" or "Christian" they were; the peasants -- the modern day equivalent of us -- would sit on cold floors and crouch beneath pews in the hope that the music and the elite bishops would grace them with God's blessing. Weird. But anyway, most of these composers had hidden critique on the church and the gospels based on their arrangements. I wonder what beef Bach had with the Gospels? And Matthew? As a preliminary proposition and observation, Bach almost appears to feminize the entire Jesus/Passion experience. Could it be, that as Jesus ushered in a new era, that the idiosyncracies related to the Gospels and the NT, which explicitly included woman where they would normally not be trusted, are actually a political message of the times--that then, shit needed to change? I wonder...
Well, now that I've sputtered out my thoughts, hope everyone has a great day tomorrow. It took me two hours to get to school on the Orange Line today. I literally could have walked their faster. Only one of the inevitable outcomes of shoddy investment in Public Transportation. Maybe more of a reason to buy an SUV...
Recent Comments